傲慢與偏見精選的英語讀后感

　　導(dǎo)語：傲慢與偏見是一本著名的國(guó)外名著，他給我們講述了：男女主角愛情上的障礙，但在現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)中也是人們相互之間交流的障礙，更是在正確對(duì)待自己，對(duì)待事物上的絆腳石。在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中，我們也會(huì)經(jīng)常因?yàn)樽约簡(jiǎn)畏矫娴南敕ǘ�是自己與他人隔開，所以我們要克服“傲慢與偏見”，主動(dòng)了解他人。那就把它記錄下來，編寫成英語范文吧，歡迎閱讀，僅供參考，更多相關(guān)的知識(shí)，請(qǐng)關(guān)注CNFLA學(xué)習(xí)網(wǎng)的欄目!

　　傲慢與偏見讀后感:

　　When I read the university have the opportunity to see "pride and prejudice", but say a word in heart, I don't think how good this book at the time, even only look at the very beginning, on the one side thought: language is so poor, nor exciting story, how can become the world's classics?

　　This time I am in accidentally get the book, because the owner of the book is highly recommended, suspicious, I decided to finish see later for the book next own conclusion. Under this idea to promote sleep I spent some time to read it, and perceptions of it changes greatly. I here the so-called change, though, does not mean completely, completely changed the original view. What I call the change, is now only to find that it is not without merit.

　　Let's say I find advantages. Look from the style, it has difference, there is no doubt about it, most of the book from the point of view of the male world, even the "Jane eyre" and "wuthering heights", is basically to write from the perspective of men, and "pride and prejudice" is obviously is filled with the thought of women, including world outlook and way of life. That best reflect on writing content: if be the male writers, write most of the work has a breathtaking colors (just strength some problems), and in this book, the most exciting period of also however is wickham elopement with Elizabeth's younger sister (and ending is not sad), the authors could think of the worst ways, only some simple interpersonal deception; Through the full text of the mother how to marry her daughter a thing. A series of facts, is the book of the feminine, and these books at that time, of course, very few, so I think it was a great success of this book.

　　A good novel should be able to reflect the style of an era, in this regard, the book is quite successful. Reading this book, it is easy to form in the mind of the European social status of women - all women to marry out as a kind of honor, and no matter who marry, marry marry women only aim in life, the true feelings is rare, and difficult to be understood, the author deeply exposing and criticizing it is these.

　　As far as weaknesses, I want to compared with other instructive: in terms of the ability of using language, it is not as good as "the count of monte cristo"; As for the story twists and turns of richness, it not as good as "gone with the wind"; At the height of the social reality, it is less than "how the steel was tempered"; In terms of characters psychological description, it inferior to wuthering heights. Although these defects is largely decided by it to describe the social reality of, but a masterpiece of so many loopholes, after all, is too far.

　　After reading this book, I very want to and it completely "gone with the wind" of the contrast. The two books in the story content, development of the plot is too similar, even character selection: corresponding darcy rhett, Elizabeth corresponds to scarlett, corresponding Vichy bentley and Jane correspond to Melanie. Relationship between were made by feelings before freezing to warming, to enthusiastic; The latter two feelings are consistent. The only difference is that the former is set in peace, the latter for war as the background. So I called "pride and prejudice" and "gone with the wind", just think, let the bentley in troubled times, he is bound to be like the Vichy ceremony down and out. Vichy ritual at the beginning, on the other hand, is also a very respectable gentleman.

　　But in the feelings of intense struggle and transformation, "pride and prejudice" couldn't compared with "gone with the wind", "gone with the wind" is set in the war, so conflict natural and easy performance, especially the grand scene of war (such as Atlanta rout, north army siege), the scenes are so exciting, so that the readers of hilarity. These for pride and prejudice is unable to reach the artistic effect. For the war and the postwar social problem, "gone with the wind" also all performance was a success, so the state of the book is by children affair sublimation for the profound thinking to the country and the society, these are the lack of "pride and prejudice".

　　From the perspective of the artistic quality of the whole book, "pride and prejudice" is not as good as gone with the wind. But that indeed it is not difficult to find that after deep thinking, it's not hard to understand. Austin as a female writer, there is no too many people agree that this is, of course, the woman writer on the many writing to less than male writers. Although I can forgive these deficiencies, but relative to the same woman writer charlotte and Emily, Austin also apparently have these aspects. So I still believe that "pride and prejudice" there are many people, but maugham referred to it as one of the world's ten famous novels are exaggerated.

　　參考翻譯：

　　在我讀大學(xué)的時(shí)候就有機(jī)會(huì)看《傲慢與偏見》，但說句心里話，當(dāng)時(shí)我并不認(rèn)為這本書有多好，甚至只看了個(gè)開頭就放到了一邊，心想：語言如此貧乏，故事又無激動(dòng)人心之處，怎么會(huì)成為世界名著呢?

　　這次我是在偶然間弄到這本書，由于書的主人極力推薦，我滿腹狐疑，才決定看完之后再對(duì)此書下一個(gè)自己的定論。在這種想法推動(dòng)下，我花了一些睡覺時(shí)間將它看完，于是對(duì)它的看法大為改觀。不過，我這里所謂的改觀，并非指完完全全、徹徹底底地改變了原先的看法。我所謂的改觀，是指現(xiàn)在才發(fā)現(xiàn)它并非毫無優(yōu)點(diǎn)。

　　先說說我發(fā)現(xiàn)的優(yōu)點(diǎn)吧。從風(fēng)格上看，它有與眾不同之處，這是毫無疑問的，大多數(shù)書都是從男性的角度看世界，即使是《簡(jiǎn)·愛》和《呼嘯山莊》，也基本上從男性的角度來寫，而《傲慢與偏見》則明顯地充滿了女性思想色彩，包括世界觀及生活方式。這一點(diǎn)在寫作內(nèi)容上得到最好體現(xiàn)：假如是男作家，寫出的作品大多具有驚險(xiǎn)色彩(只是強(qiáng)弱一些的問題)，而本書中，最激動(dòng)人心的一段也不過是威克姆與伊麗莎白之妹私奔(而且結(jié)局并不悲慘)，作者能想到的最惡劣的行徑，也只是一些人與人之間的簡(jiǎn)單欺騙;貫穿全文的一件事就是母親如何嫁女兒。這一系列的事實(shí)，都表現(xiàn)了這本書的女性化，而這類書在那個(gè)時(shí)代當(dāng)然極少，所以我認(rèn)為這是本書極大的成功之處。

　　一部好的小說應(yīng)當(dāng)可以反映一個(gè)時(shí)代的風(fēng)貌，就這一點(diǎn)而言，此書也表現(xiàn)得相當(dāng)成功。讀了這本書，頭腦中不難形成當(dāng)時(shí)歐洲女性社會(huì)的.狀況——所有女子都以嫁出去作為一種榮譽(yù)，而不管嫁給誰，婚娶成了婦女唯一的人生目標(biāo)，真正的感情既少見，又難以被理解，作者深刻揭露與批判的正是這些。

　　談到缺點(diǎn)，我想與其他書作比較：就運(yùn)用語言的能力而言，它不及《基督山伯爵》;就故事的曲折豐富性而言，它不及《亂世佳人》;就表現(xiàn)社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的高度而言，它不及《鋼鐵是怎樣煉成的》;就人物心理描寫而言，它不及《呼嘯山莊》。雖然這些缺陷很大程度上是由它要描寫的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)決定的，但一本名著出現(xiàn)這么多的漏洞，畢竟是太過分了。

　　讀完這本書，我極想將它與《亂世佳人》進(jìn)行完全深入的對(duì)比。這兩本書在故事內(nèi)容，情節(jié)發(fā)展上太相似了，就連人物選取也如出一轍：達(dá)西對(duì)應(yīng)瑞德，伊麗莎白對(duì)應(yīng)斯佳麗，賓利對(duì)應(yīng)維希禮，簡(jiǎn)對(duì)應(yīng)媚蘭。前兩者間關(guān)系都由感情封凍到暖化，再到熱烈;后兩者的感情則始終如一。唯一不同之處是，前者以和平為背景，后者以戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)為背景。所以我將《傲慢與偏見》稱為和平版《亂世佳人》，試想，讓賓利處在亂世，他必然會(huì)與維希禮一樣落魄。相反，維希禮在開始時(shí)也是十分體面的紳士。

　　但在感情的激烈斗爭(zhēng)與轉(zhuǎn)化上，《傲慢與偏見》完全無法與《亂世佳人》對(duì)比，《亂世佳人》以戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)為背景，那么感情沖突自然容易表現(xiàn)，尤其是戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的宏大場(chǎng)面(例如亞特蘭大潰退，北軍圍城)，這一幕幕都是如此激動(dòng)人心，以至于讀者難以釋卷。這些對(duì)《傲慢與偏見》來說是無法達(dá)到的藝術(shù)效果。對(duì)整場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)及戰(zhàn)后的社會(huì)問題，《亂世佳人》也都表現(xiàn)得很成功，于是這本書的境界也就由兒女私情升華為對(duì)國(guó)家、對(duì)社會(huì)的深刻思索，這些也是《傲慢與偏見》的匱乏的東西。

　　從整本書的藝術(shù)性來看，《傲慢與偏見》的確不及《亂世佳人》。但這在深刻思索后的確不難發(fā)現(xiàn)，也不難理解。奧斯丁作為女作家，并無太多人贊同，這當(dāng)然造成了女作家在許多寫作才能上不及男作家。盡管我可以原諒這些不足，但相對(duì)于同樣的女作家夏洛蒂與艾米莉，奧斯丁也顯然有這些方面不足。所以至今我還堅(jiān)信，《傲慢與偏見》的確有許多過人之處，但毛姆將它列為世界十大著名小說之一就未免言過其實(shí)了。